The following information is used for educational purposes only.
Apple briefly passes Exxon as largest U.S. company
Tue, Aug 9 2011
By Poornima Gupta and Rodrigo Campos
SAN FRANCISCO/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Apple Inc briefly edged past Exxon Mobil Corp to become the most valuable U.S. company on Tuesday, displacing an old economy stalwart and heralding an era where technology holds sway.
Although Apple slipped back to the No. 2 spot after the close, market watchers said it is simply a matter of time before the company that defined the smartphone and tablet markets with the iPhone and iPad ascends the top.
The technology giant's market value rose on Tuesday to $341.5 billion in severely choppy afternoon trading, just above Exxon's $341.4 billion, even though the oil major's annual revenue is four times that of Apple's.
Exxon quickly regained the No. 1 spot as its shares rose and Apple's shed some of their gains, with stocks globally remaining volatile because of soft economic data and the downgrading of the United States' sovereign credit on Friday.
Exxon ended on Tuesday with a market cap of $348.3 billion followed by Apple at $346.7 billion.
The potential changing of the guard, which is largely symbolic, reflects the influence and power of certain industries over the U.S. economy in different points in time.
"Technology is what people understand now," said Robert Pavlik, chief market strategist at Banyan Partners. "At some point it used to be the radio, before that it was trains. So I think it's sort of indicative of our society."
Tuesday's move by Apple, which for a short time ended Exxon Mobil's run of more than five years at the top, capped a remarkable turnaround for a company that once teetered on the brink before Apple CEO Steve Jobs returned to resuscitate the enterprise he co-founded.
Thirteen years ago, some analysts said Apple's value consisted of real estate holdings and cash on hand.
Apple joined, albeit briefly, a group of nine companies that have held the top spot in the S&P 500, including General Electric Co, General Motors, IBM Corp, Microsoft Corp and AT&T Inc, DuPont, Philip Morris Cos and Wal-Mart Stores Inc, according to Standard & Poor's Index Analytics.
Apple will officially become the 10th member of that group only if its market cap at the close of trading is higher than Exxon's, said Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at S&P Indices.
The Silicon Valley icon, which was included in the S&P 500 index in 1982, has clawed its way to the top of the chart from the 287th position it held 10 years ago, he added.
RIDING THE MOBILE WAVE
Exxon became the most valuable U.S. company in 2006 on the back of higher oil and gas prices, while GE got top valuation when heavy equipment, energy, military contracts and finance represented a large portion of the U.S. economy.
GM, which went bankrupt in 2009 and is now back in the market through a new initial public offering, topped the list when automobile manufacturing was biggest symbol of American industrial power.
Apple is riding the mobile wave that has swept up consumers worldwide. Since Jobs' return, the company has cranked out a string of now-iconic, category-defining products, from the Mac and the iPod music player to the iPhone and now the iPad, which almost single handedly created the tablet computer market.
Apple now demands a position in virtually every long-term investor's portfolio on the strength of its deft handling of overseas production and supply, as well as perceptions of an unerring antenna for consumer tastes.
Since July 1, Apple's market capitalization has risen by more than $20 billion, fueled by optimism a new version of its best-selling iPhone will lead to a monstrous second half of 2011.
Exxon's market cap, on the other hand, has slipped about $50 billion in the same period due to volatile crude oil prices.
But many on Wall Street are concerned about Jobs' ailing health and fear the company will not be the same without its hard-driving, visionary leader. Others are worried about the rising popularity of Google-powered smartphones.
The two companies, however, have little in common for investors. Exxon pays a regular quarterly dividend, while the last dividend paid by Apple was in November 1995. Also, Exxon spends billions to buy back its own shares each quarter.
(Additional reporting by Anna Driver in Houston; editing by Steve Orlofsky and Andre Grenon)
Why Apple might just be the first $1 trillion company
Aug 9, 2011
By Robert Cyran
Could Apple be worth $1 trillion? It’s conceivable. The $342 billion iPhone and iPad maker became – if only briefly – the most valuable company in the United States when it surpassed Exxon Mobil on Aug. 9. Yet its sales have been surging 80 percent a year, and profit faster. And Apple trades roughly in line with the growing U.S. market — and at less than half the price-to-earnings multiple it fetched in 2006, when revenue growth was much slower.
Apple now trades at about 11 times estimated earnings for the fiscal year ending September 2012. The S&P 500 index is valued at about 10 times next year’s earnings. But Apple’s sales growth is not far off 10 times faster than that of the average company. The gadget producer also sits on $76 billion of cash and investments.
To get at this dissonance another way, consider Apple’s PEG ratio. This hints at the price of growth by dividing a company’s PE ratio by its projected percentage earnings growth. A smaller figure suggests a company is cheaper. Apple’s is 0.2. That’s low compared to growth darlings. Burrito purveyor Chipotle Mexican Grill, for instance, comes in at 2.1, and Salesforce.com at 13.2. Pandora and LinkedIn aren’t even expected to make money.
Alternatively, put Apple on the same PE multiple it traded on in 2006, and it would be worth almost $900 billion. A premium for today’s faster growth could get it to $1 trillion. Apple can’t be so cheap just because Steve Jobs is in precarious health.
True, Apple already sells more per quarter than it did in all of fiscal 2007, and it takes more and more success to move the needle. Growth could easily slow. Yet the smartphone and tablet markets are young, the company’s customers show remarkable fidelity, and areas such as television are ripe for new gadgets. Moreover, Apple’s return on equity is almost twice what it was in 2006, suggesting it has pricing power.
Maybe investors simply can’t fathom so large a company. A $1 trillion Apple would mean adding all of Microsoft, Google, Intel and Amazon — and more to the firm’s current market capitalization. Perhaps Apple is correctly priced, the market too expensive, and growth stocks grotesquely so. But something doesn’t add up. In relative terms, Apple should be worth far more.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Los Campanelli y los Benvenuto, por Alejandro Borensztein
The following information is used for educational purposes only. Los Campanelli y los Benvenuto Las insólitas peleas internas dentro del g...
-
The following information is used for educational purposes only. Filmed February 2017 at TEDLagos Ideas Search Stephanie Busari: How f...
-
The following information is used for educational purposes only. We the Future | September 2018 Michael Green: The global goals we´ve ...
-
The following information is used for educational purposes only. Volvió el Javi de la gente Los nuevos tuits de Milei, el reportaje que di...

No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are welcomed as far as they are constructive and polite.